مسؤولیت مدنی بدون تقصیر ناشی از انتقال خون آلوده

author

Abstract:

Blood transfusion centers objective is to prevent death that is risky too; because from one side it is about blood that can be infected with life threatening diseases at any time, and from the other side it deals with human body and health which is the most important asses of each individual. Therefore, it is a duty for blood transfusion centers to be equipped with latest technologies and equipments well as to have expert human resources. The governments should also support these centers with enough budget and regulations. Any default in blood transfusion procedure by the centers or by their staff can lead to incurable problems for the receiver/s on the one hand and can cause responsibility for the centers and their staff on the other hand, and should be remedied according to the Causality Principle (qāedeye Tasbib). In most cases either the default has not occurred, or if it has, it cannot be proven. Consequently, according to the above principle we cannot blame anybody for the loss or damage and ask him or her to remedy it! But this is not fair and somebody should answer for that accident. We cannot rule out the responsibility of blood transfusion centers simply because one cannot prove their default in health risks customers/ victims are facing with or the illness or harm they are coping with. Islamic jurisprudence (Fiqh) has a solution for this؛ The Principle of Deception (qāedeye Ghoror) can cover these situations and provide support and remedy for the blood transfusion victims. Sick people who trust blood transfusion centers and refer to them with confidence to acquire needed blood and assistance are in fact deceived by their name and their adverts. This makes the situations ready to apply the above principle. By applying the Principle of Deception, the deceiver is responsible to compensate, fiscally and morally, the deceived.

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

مسئولیت مدنی ناشی از انتقال خون آلوده

شیوع بیماری های ویروسی خطرناک (همچون ایدز و هپاتیت) در اواخر قرن گذشته و امکان انتقال آنها از طریق تزریق خون، مسئله آثار حقوقی و مسئولیت ناشی از انتقال خون آلوده را مطرح کرده است. در جریان انتقال خون عوامل متعددی دخالت دارند و ممکن است مسئول باشند و مسئولیت هر یک تابع قواعد خاص است: مراکز انتقال خون، مراکز درمانی که خون آلوده در آنجا به بیمار تزریق شده، پزشکی که انتقال خون را تجویز نموده یا آن ...

full text

دامنه مسؤولیت مدنی مراجع دولتی و عمومی در جبران زیان ناشی از انتقال خون

The government is engaged in producing and distributing of blood and blood products as a part of public health, medical and therapeutic needs through the Iranian blood transfusion organization which works under supervision of ministry of health and medical education. The multiple lawsuits of compensating blood infections have prompted the organization, to claim exemption from compensation of bl...

full text

تحول مفهوم تقصیر در حقوق مسؤولیت مدنی

مفهوم تقصیر، همانند سایر پدیده های اجتماعی، در حال حرکت و تغییر است و باید آن را تابعی از عدالت شمرد؛ عدالتی که اقتضای آن با تغییر شرایط زندگی دگرگون می شود. عوامل مادی و اقتصادی و فلسفی و اجتماعی هر کدام در تغییر شرایط زندگی سهمی مؤثر دارد؛ ولی، جز در موارد استثنایی و انقلابی، عوامل اقتصادی و مادی در این حرکت پیشتاز است و توجیه مناسب اخلاقی و فلسفی را به دنبال خود می کشد. در این فرایند تاریخی،...

full text

مسئولیت مدنی ناشی از انتقال خون و عضو آلوده

گسترش ایدز و هپاتیت و سایر بیماری ها خونی، مسائلی را در جوامع امروز به همراه داشته است. از جمل? این مسائل انتقال خون می باشد که یکی از عوامل انتقال این بیماری ها محسوب می شود. این انتقال می تواند از طریق تزریق خون در مراکز درمانی یا انجام عمل جراحی از جمله جراحی پیوند عضو صورت گیرد. لذا مسئولیت مدنی ناشی از انتقال خون و عضو آلوده را از آن جهت مطرح نمودیم تا با بررسی عوامل دخیل در انتقال خون و ع...

مسؤولیت مدنی ناشی از پس‌زدن عضو پیوندی

The rejection or rebuff of transplanted organs refers to the case in which the immune system of the recipient's body repels the transplanted organ. The prevention and reduction of such repulsions are the main concern of transplant surgeons and recipients. Liabilities associated with repulsion and its side-effects have a contractual nature; also, unlike other surgery-related liabilities, here th...

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later

Save to my library Already added to my library

{@ msg_add @}


Journal title

volume 4  issue 14

pages  153- 191

publication date 2010-10

By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.

Keywords

No Keywords

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023